John stockton vs chris paul stats series#
John stockton vs chris paul stats tv#

Season 6-10: Paul 70.8 games average, 163.8 steals per season.Season 1-5: Paul 69.0 games average, 164.4 steals per season.But his career averages are playing in 79.2 games per season, and stealing away 171.8 balls a season. He didn’t play to season 20, only season 19. Season 16-20: Stockton 82.0 games average, 141.0 steals per season.Season 11-15: Stockton 72.0 games average, 134.0 steals per season.Season 6-10: Stockton 81.2 games average, 216.6 steals per season.Season 1-5: Stockton 82.0 games average, 189.6 steals per season.Let’s look at the breakdowns for both players: He’s also in his third movement of his career, if you divide a career into segments of five seasons each. You can’t get ANY stats if you are sitting behind the bench in a suit. He’s 31 and I don’t know if the advancements in medicine and private planes will help extend his career. How likely is it that Paul is going to make up that 400 difference, AND catch up to the 1000 more he’s behind? Paul is no spring chicken. At that same time, 12 years in the NBA, Stockton had 2365. Paul, in 12 years, has 1910 steals as previous mentioned. It’s just very hard to pass someone when you go slower than them. So for 10 of the 12 seasons between the two players Stockton has increased his lead. Only twice in his 12 season career did he finish with more steals than John - and both of those were back when John was a bench player. CP3 plays fewer games per year and gets fewer steals per season. John played 19 years, and Chis is in his 12th. Chris is 1355 behind, and 58.49 % of the way there. Right now, not including playoff stats - which should count for career stats - John has 3265 steals. Someone said that CP3 would pass John in steals, an admission that no one will pass him for assists.

John stockton vs chris paul stats tv#

Stockton CRUSHES Paul in everything besides shooting the ball a lot as a pass-first point guard and TV ads. It’s absurd that we elevate Paul, and in the same absentminded thought, disregard John Stockton.

Is CP3 even in the Top 3 at his right now? Really? In an era of Stephen Curry, James Harden, Russell Westbrook, John Wall, Kyrie Irving, Isaiah Thomas, and man, non-playoff version of Kyle Lowry? Some think that there’s a valid comparison to be made between Paul and guys like Magic and Isiah - multiple championship winners who dominated the position. Only the most boring and not-fun people would even look past the suprificial superstar and see that, yes, there are flaws there. It’s hard to even think of other point guards who have tangible accomplishments when you get lost so easily in Paul’s light brown eyes, slightly obscured by lush lashes. He’s truly one of the best at never leading his team anywhere while getting paid a lot.įurthermore, if you want a vocal leader on the court who will yell at the refs all game long and kick his legs out like a baby having a tantrum, it’s hard not to select Paul over other guards like Gary Payton, Oscar Robertson, and others. Over his Hall of Fame career we’ve seen him play with tenacity on both ends of the court, and be back home in time for a long summer vacation each year.

This is after coming into the NBA Draft dubbed as ‘the next’ Isiah Thomas. Over the last little while I’m seeing big name analysts claim that he’s the best point guard since Magic Johnson. IV.According to some, Chris Paul is not just one of the best point guards of all time, but Top 5.II: Introducing WOWYR – top players of the ’50s, ’60s & ’70s.

Part II provides background and context and might be a good starting point for those entirely unfamiliar with this family.

John stockton vs chris paul stats series#

The methodology for the original WOWYR, run using all qualifying players entire careers and only carved out sections of their prime, is outlined in Part III of the series (linked below). An alternative version that is more of a “pure” game-level plus-minus (GPM) is laid out in Part IV, along with a discussion of strengths, weaknesses and variability within the metric. This allows for a historical, apple-to-apples comparison of per-game impact from before play-by-play was available (1997). Instead of using results from lineups within a game (play-by-play data) like traditional APM, game-level plus-minus uses final scores from game to game for the players from that game. WOWYR (With or Without You, Regressed) is a game-level plus-minus measurement and a cousin of play-by-play measurements like Adjusted Plus-Minus (APM).